You have only to ocmpare various historical periods and you will see the progress and meaning of man’s struggle and therefore also the “theory” that gives sense and direction to that struggle. – XIX
The Bridge over the Drina is one of my new favourite books. It chronicles the story of the
people in Višgrad, a real town near the actual bridge Mehmed Paša Sokolović Bridge, from it’s creation in the late 16th century to 1914 when it was bombed in real life. More than one story, the book is created by a set of short stories, glimpese into how the life of people living at this set place could have been and could have changed during the 350 years the books spans. The glimps were written by someone who both had a doctorate in the subject, (Ivo Andrić got his ph.d. in 1924 with the name of his thesis being “The Development of the Spiritual Life of Bosnia under the Influence of Turkish Sovereignty”) and someone who spent part of his childhood in Višgrad.
This could be the reason why the book has a pacing difficulty of sorts. In one sense I didn’t care, as I said it’s not a cohesive narrative, but I did find it odd that about 1/3 of the book covered the last 8 years of the 350 year long time line. This is natural as this would be the years Ivo spent in Višgrad and do point to the biggest strength of the book: Wow, this feel accurate. I studied cultural history in school and I’ve always said the difference between cultural history and “history” history is that cultural history is the history of the people. It’s the stories of the people in the streets living their lives the best they can. Yes, some have more power than others, but no-one has any political power to go to war or anything like this. This book felt like an incredible realistic depiction of the cultural history of this town and the people in it. Not that the people are real, but that what they represent is the real life. I loved that this book didn’t just show the cultural history of this town, but gave a very interesting take on how culture do change in 350 years. At a time where globalization and modernization is talked about so much as a threat to our identity and us as a group, it’s wonderful to see someone depict that this has been the case since groups became a thing. Even Socrates complained on the youth of the day ruining society.
Old ideas and old values clashed with the new ones, merges with them or existed side by side, as if waiting to see which would outlive which. – XI
Who has power in a society changes, and these changes live on and muddle the water even when the group don’t know why. It shows how decisions made by people far away, as Višgrad is a small rural town, impact them both willingly and unwillingly. Bosnia and Herzegovina has a long and complicated history, being under Turkey, Austria, having Serbians living there, connections with Balkan and of course the big wars that was fought around them. Ivo has a great way of talking relativistic how people on different stages would react to these things so much grander than the little town and small houses around them. About the violence and mistrust that seeped in, and how people yet managed to form bonds that lasted for years, and how people could be known long after their death. William H. McNeill did write “No better introduction to the study of Balkan and Ottoman history exists”. I will go one higher: Never before have I read such a great book that shows why history as a subject matters. That shows how we as a society change over 350 years.
I recommend this book not only for people interested in the history of that part of Europe, but also people who are interested in history as a subject and people interested in Nations and Culture as a subject. If you want to talk about how we are what we are, no matter the we you are referring to, this is a great what to learn how we do become we.
With a warning that history is filled with blood and violence, people and practices that make you angry, and incredible individuals.
I’ve also created a vlog where I use this book to discuss in what degree we should rely on facts in ficion: